New Page 1
SMOs, India's Next Frontier in Clinical Research
Site Management Organizations are the new breed of service providers
helping in principal investigator selection, patient recruitment and regulatory
and contract management and research support for multiple sites.
Dr K Sashi Kiran
The author is managing director, D2L Pharma Research Solutions Pvt Ltd
(D2L-SMO), India
Quality assurance and timelines have always been a serious
concern to the rapidly growing clinical research market in India. With India now
being seen as a hub for clinical trials, the challenge is to gear up to
accomplish these expected standards. The growing demand for new ICH-GCP
compliant sites, qualified investigators, vast patient pool and experienced
staff only adds commotion to the industry. It is under such circumstances that a
new set of service providers has emerged in the clinical research market-Site
Management Organizations (SMOs). These SMOs' role in meeting the sponsor's
and the CRO's requirements is being greatly appreciated.
Multi-site SMOs
-
SMOs play a major role in the trials offering
-
Training and assisting the investigators
throughout the study
-
Ensuring faster recruitment of the subjects
-
Assisting PI s in adhering to the protocol
-
High-quality data entry
-
Mounting the protocol-specific infrastructure in
tim
|
The market share
CROs will continue to increase their share in the next five
years, but the mix of non-CRO players is also a dynamic one. Though Non-CROs are
many, the major chunk of the business is enjoyed by the Academic Medical Centers
(AMCs). The SMOs are expanding their operations and striving to provide quality
services to increase their share in the clinical research market pie.
Role of SMOs in clinical research
While CROs offer a variety of services to the sponsor such as
monitoring, contract administration, study supplies shipping and receiving and
data management, SMOs offer principal investigator selection, patient
recruitment and regulatory and contract management and research support for
multiple sites.
There are two operational models which SMOs follow--one which
is confined to a single site or a therapeutic segment and the other which work
on multiple sites and specialty segments.
SMOs have substantiated their contribution from training
young, dynamic and inexperienced investigators with GCP guidelines and providing
them an opportunity to conduct clinical trials. The investigators are relieved
from time-consuming, non-clinical tasks like data entry and documentations, thus
allowing them to concentrate more on the recruitment.
An advantage of working with the site and investigator in
close proximity and an access to the local clinical and logistic requirements
keeps them far ahead for planning and completion of an assignment. Unlike the
sponsors or the CROs, they also have an access to the various hospital data at
the site. This helps them in giving a proper feasibility report regarding the
sites and also plan for a faster recruitment.
The SMOs keep their study staff in continuous monitoring of
the study subjects to assess the SAEs and prevent a follow up loss. Often the
coordinators are given patient assessment charts to monitor the symptoms by
phone before the next visit is planned.
Retention of subjects, which is one of the major challenges
in India, is overcome by continuous reminders and calls to the subject by the
study coordinators.
Another major offering from the SMOs is providing the
administrative support to the investigator. The study staff is trained with
responsibilities of preparing and maintaining informed consent documents,
subject case histories, assisting the investigator to conduct research in
accordance with the protocol, data entry, maintaining study records, regulating
disposition of the study drug/device13 and assisting in project close-out
documentations thus reducing the work of a PI.
A central contract with its investigators and various sites
enables the Multi site SMOs to play a vital role in bringing together the
various potential sites and investigators all over the country, thus providing
research support to tier-2 cities.
Multisite SMOs have the bandwidth for selecting the most
appropriate investigators and sites on a study to study basis. Thus by
interacting with several potential sites, they are free to select the sites
according to the protocol requirements. An SMO with these attributes will be a
sponsor's ideal partner to work with.
Challenges of CROs
It has not been a smooth ride for the sponsors to
perform their trial related activities. While the dearth of skilled
staff and trained investigators continues to be a hindrance, the
ethics committee formalities remain a major challenge.
Experienced sites being limited to urban areas and
with several projects already on hand, the investigators have always
faced a problem with more incoming studies. It has been estimated that
there are only about 1,000 experienced investigators available in the
country, and there is a need for many more who understand the ICH-GCP,
DCGI guidelines and the protocol specific requirements.
Some of the major issues during the study have been
retention of subjects due to lack of regular follow-up, protocol
adherence and the data quality. Delays in recruitment have always been
a concern in meeting the stipulated timelines. Moreover the time spent
on documentations and data quality by the investigators themselves
with inexperienced site staff impaired and delayed several studies.
|
Giving the impetus
SMOs have made an enormous difference to overcome several
hurdles throughout the study, reassuring the market escalation.
Both the pharma majors and CROs would greatly benefit working
with SMOs for a more efficient research thus bringing an extensive cost
advantage.
The much apprehensive data quality standards and time factors
can be reassured further by working with these SMOs.
With over 16,000 hospitals, 500,000 doctors and 270 medical
institutions, there is a major scope for these SMOs to expand their network
throughout the country reaching out to the
tier-2 cities.
The views expressed herein are the personal views of the
authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the company they represent
or any of its member firms.
Page(s) 1 |