|
Advertisement
|
|
Home > Careers
| "Centralized Recruitment Cell at CSIR, a future possibility" |
|
| Rolly Dureha |
| Thursday, January 08, 2004 |
|
New Page 1
"Centralized Recruitment Cell at CSIR, a future possibility"
 |
Dr CM
Gupta,
Director, Central Drug Research Institute(CDRI), Lucknow

|
 |
Dr CM Gupta,
Director, Central Drug Research Institute(CDRI), Lucknow

|
 |
Dr CM
Gupta,
Director, Central Drug Research Institute(CDRI), Lucknow

|
|
Q. What is the admission procedure followed by
your organizations? Is there any remodeling on the cards?
Dr CM Gupta:
CDRI is a government funded non-profit organization.
Employment opportunities for faculty recruitment are advertised in leading
national dailies, scientific journals like Nature and Science and on CDRI-website
to attract the best talent, interested in serving the nation. Ad-hoc
appointments are also made through "Quick Hire Scheme" of
Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR) in the case of
extremely suitable candidates.
Research trainees constitute a major workforce of the
institute. For admission to the PhD program of the institute, the CSIR-NET
qualified candidates can directly join the institute in their area of
interest subject to consent from the institute’s faculty to be the
candidate’s supervisor and director’s approval. Considering the
emergence of new specialized disciplines and their need in drug R&D,
CSIR has recently permitted fresh engineering and medical graduates and M
Pharma candidates with a valid GATE score to avail CSIR fellowships for
pursuing a research career, in addition to CSIR lateral entry as senior
research fellow. Besides, CDRI holds a written examination-cum-interview
for selection of research fellows to work in grant-in-aid projects and
research schemes.
A "Centralized Recruitment Cell" at CSIR like
DRDO and ICAR may be a future possibility.
Dr Lalji Singh:
For scientists: A large number of Indian scientists
from all over the world apply to CCMB every year. We also advertise in
internationally reputed journals giving details of specific expertise that
we are looking for. All the potential job applicants are requested to give
a seminar and have one-to-one discussions with our scientists. An expert
committee (which includes experts from outside CCMB and outside CSIR)
would short-list the candidates for interviews. Selection of candidates is
based on their publication record, their research proposal that they want
to take up in CCMB, suitability of the research proposal in the context of
the on-going projects in CCMB and CCMB’s aspirations to initiate new
fields.
For students: We select CSIR-NET or ICMR-JRF qualified
students (about 250) for a written test. Those (about 50) who clear our
written test would appear for interviews, which are done in two rounds.
Success rate of the final selection is between 5 and 15.
Although CSIR is fair and more flexible than any other
government organizations in the country, yet there are many areas related
to recruitment and promotion, which needs substantial improvement.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
Students come to IGIB either during their post
graduation for two-six months as trainees or as PhD students. The trainees
may apply by directly writing to Head, PME, Institute of Genomics and
Integrative Biology (IGIB), Mall Road, Delhi - 110 007. They may also
contact scientists directly either in person or through e-mail addresses
available on our website (www.igib.res.in). Students who have cleared CSIR/NET
examination are eligible for applying to join for PhD under the guidance
of scientists at IGIB. Usually they have to be selected through an
interview conducted once in a year.
Currently, scientists are recruited on the basis of
applications against advertisements, which appear in popular dailies and
international research journals. The recommendations of previous employers
and a proven track record in terms of publications of good impact are
critical factors in the selection procedure. In future, we intend to make
the admission procedure more hassle-free. The first few steps towards this
like information dissemination through Internet and rapid screening of
applications reducing the time between application to selection by as much
as two-three months have already been implemented.
|
|
Q. What are your strengths? How are the
government institutions planning to face the challenges posed by the
private sector?
Dr CM Gupta:
CDRI is a unique combination of medicinal chemistry and
biological sciences which is key to solving major challenges of new
drug-discovery R&D. The institute’s strength lies in its strong
R&D and availability of wide-spectrum of properly validated in vitro
and in vivo screening models in disease areas of national relevance.
State-of-the-art infrastructure and technologies have further augmented
the drug R&D program. These include new disciplines and expertise in
combinatorial chemistry, high-throughput screening, genomics, proteomics,
computational biology, bioinformatics and structural and molecular
biology.
The concept of R&D-based pharma sector is fast
picking up and private sector has invested in basic research for the
discovery and development of new drugs. However, only a few disease areas
are covered by these pharma companies as their selection is directed
solely by the market size and business opportunities. The priorities of
government institutions, especially a drug research laboratory, are driven
more by societal welfare and knowledge contribution.
CDRI’s major contributions are two antimalarial
drugs, a contraceptive agent, a memory enhancer and a spermicidal cream.
Such institutions are therefore not only centers-of-excellence but also
provide centralized infrastructure to cater to the practical skill
development of students and mid-career professionals. In fact, there have
been continuous efforts in bringing the pharma industry and R&D
institutions together.
The major challenge posed by the private sector is the
corporate culture, where timelines are met, appreciated and rewarded. For
improving accountability in the CSIR system, regular monitoring at the
level of headquarter had been introduced.
Dr Lalji Singh:
Our strength is in the academic performance of our
scientists, their desire to apply the knowledge into some application, our
infrastructure that helps to take up any project in modern biology and our
support staff. Our instrumentation engineers, administrative and finance
staff work over-time (without any extra benefits) to meet the deadlines.
CCMB’s strength lies in the fact that every one, whether he/she is a
scientist or a support-staff, consider CCMB as his/her family.
CCMB’s real strength lies in it being an institute
having one of the best infrastructure in the world to carry out basic
research in the area of modern biology. We have a very strong
instrumentation division and all our equipment are maintained, serviced
and repaired in-house.
CCMB has large intake of PhD students who are selected
through a national selection process. Students prefer to join CCMB because
it provides single occupancy hostel facility with kitchenette and attached
bathroom, facility for gym and lounge, common washing facilities, solar
water heating and canteen facility for breakfast, lunch and dinner.
The institute and all the services operate round the
clock. We provide transport to students and scientists at late hours to
drop them at their residences. Most of the facilities at CCMB are
centrally operated by trained technical staff. Everyone including students
are free to go to any floor and use any equipment, if it is not already in
use, simply by entering into a log book. The institute has a very
congenial atmosphere with freedom and discipline, where human dignity is
held very high. There is no hierarchy here. CCMB also recognizes, promotes
and rewards excellence. The research atmosphere is unique which is not
easy for private sector to create. CCMB provides appropriate accommodation
for its staff in a beautifully maintained campus close to the institute.
CCMB provides transport for the children of the staff to take them to
schools and colleges and also bring them back.
All these features mentioned above make CCMB very
unique in attracting the talent and retaining them. However, we do
perceive the threat from private sector, which is prepared to pay any
amount of salary to take the best persons from CCMB. Everyone cannot
resist this. But, because of the features mentioned above, the institute
does attract talent from outside the country, in fact even more than what
we can accommodate.
We are strangulated by the rules formulated by our
headquarters in Delhi causing enormous delays in procuring things and
marching ahead because of the interference from the headquarters and
essentially because CSIR follows typical government rules. This is
partially a matter of concern because we are trying to compete
internationally where time is money. Private sector, of course, implements
things much faster and time is very valuable for them. Unless the things
are improved, we might lose talent because they do not have patience to
wait forever. An institution like CCMB needs more autonomy.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
IGIB offers excellent infrastructure and our mandate
encompasses interesting areas of research. But our true strength is a
unique environment where the researcher can strike an optimal balance
between fundamental research and that oriented with application potential.
|
|
Q. Red-tapism is often said to be the major
stumbling block faced by the researchers in government organizations …
Dr CM Gupta:
Organizations like CSIR, ICMR, ISRO, and BARC are
premier institutions with considerable autonomy in their functioning and
no visible red tapism.
Dr Lalji Singh:
This, in fact, is a major concern. However, CCMB is
much more flexible in functioning and faster but still not up to the mark.
CSIR laboratories have a lot of autonomy, which gives power to the
director to speed up the process by convincing the administration. We do
it by making administration a part of the day-to-day interaction with the
scientists and trying to convince them that their first priority is not
just to follow the rules but to help the director and other scientists in
achieving the objectives of the institution. In doing so, if there is
necessity to bend the rules, they should do so and strengthen the hands of
the director. They should fully understand what work scientists do and
what harm delays can cause. The staff at the managerial level, such as
administrative officer or a stores and purchase officer or finance and
accounts officer, when they join CCMB, around, showing them the facilities
and educating them what it means if the equipment goes out of order and
remains idle for a month. This convinces them and they should march on
along with the director. We at CCMB have practically no problems with the
administration. However, we have serious problems with the administration
at CSIR headquarters in terms of speed with which decisions must be taken;
things are improving but it has a long way to go. If this is not improved
further, I am afraid we will lose out to the private sector.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
Indeed, the slow movement of papers has been a
crippling factor to the rate at which decisions can be implemented in
government organizations. At IGIB, we have initiated concrete and long
reaching measures to correct them. Networking the institute and
computerization of many processes was one of the first steps taken in this
direction. More long-term steps, which are aimed at changing the
underlying process, have also been initiated. People trained at leading
management institutes have been brought into the organization to take a
fresh look at the procedures, simplify them where possible and revamp them
wherever necessary with input from the members of the organization.
|
|
Q. How do the Government institutes compete with
the private sector on the facilities, growth prospects, salaries and
environment offered to researchers?
Dr CM Gupta:
CDRI is one of the best institutions in the country
with respect to the facilities, growth prospects and environment for
research. The Ninth Five Year Plan is a witness to the modernization of
this laboratory. The institute has acquired many sophisticated equipment
like robotic multiple organic synthesizers, high-throughput screening
facility, structural biology facility, LC-MSMS facility, confocal
microscope, and microarray facility.
The institute has a conducive environment for research
with incentives, empowerment, recognition and skill upgradation of its
staff. The promotion policies for regular staff as well as research
fellowships are also revised from time to time. The new recruitment and
assessment scheme introduced in 1981 has since been revised and
implemented as MANAS for the benefit of the employees. Research
fellowships JRF/SRF/RA etc have also been revised to attract interested
and deserving candidates.
There can be no comparison of salaries between the two
sectors but the salaries offered to the scientists are the best in a
government set-up with ample opportunities and freedom to learn and work.
Dr Lalji Singh:
As of now, no single private biotech company in India
is as well equipped as government labs. CCMB is one of the most
well-equipped lab in the country and we do not expect any competition in
the near future. Furthermore, much of our work is academic in nature,
which has no counterpart in the private sector. Regarding salaries, ours
are far below those paid by the private sector. But, scientists still join
us because we provide facilities for their research and create suitable
environment around them. Only when we hire competent software engineers,
we face stiff competition due to poor salary levels.
Our scientists are encouraged to apply for research
grants to other organizations, other than CISR, within the country and
abroad. As far as CCMB is concerned, we have been internationally
competitive in bringing huge international grants for basic research. Our
external cash flow is more than 50 percent of our annual grant, which is
quite satisfying. In fact, our scientists prefer to compete for
international grants because they do not have to give monthly progress
reports and fill up hundreds of forms. For international grants, they have
to give reports only annually and the final report to be submitted after
the completion of the duration of the project. CCMB carries out high
quality basic research, which leads to applications. In India, private
sectors hardly spend any money for carrying out basic research.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
Government institutes and the Indian private sector
establishments span a wide range in terms of facilities. But the best
government organizations offer facilities superior to the best private
sector establishments at present. Moreover, government organizations like
CSIR have a large network, which enables optimal utilization of pooled
resources. Growth prospects have traditionally been better in private
organization but with the increasing need to break out of time-bound
promotion patterns, the trend is likely to change. Salaries are relatively
lower in government organizations but the freedom and creativity nurtured,
factors, which are very critical in research, by the environment in a
young and growing research institute like IGIB still attracts the best
talent. |
|
Q. By and large what do the institutions look for
in the potential candidates and what do they expect from its researchers?
Dr CM Gupta:
The candidates are expected to have a good grasp of the
basic subject and ability to pick up related areas, in addition to a good
practical hand and observation skills. Since drug development is a
multidisciplinary activity, the ability to work in a team would be an
added asset. A strong commitment to the organization would be sufficient
to fulfill the expectations of the institute.
Dr Lalji Singh:
We look for scientific performance, novel ideas,
integrity, ability to provide leadership, ability to work in a team,
desire to achieve goals in shortest-time possible and desire to apply the
scientific knowledge into human cause.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
Originality and an innovative approach in research, the
ability to work in a team are appealing qualities while sound scientific
knowledge is a prerequisite. Scientists who are proud to work in India and
see themselves as a part of this country’s progress are valued members
of IGIB. When IGIB hires a young researcher, we try to see if he has the
potential to grow into scientific figure of international repute in
future. |
|
Q. How do you see the opportunity for researchers
in the government labs growing in the future?
Dr CM Gupta:
All national research laboratories in the country are
being continuously refurbished with regard to modern infrastructure. The
aim is to attract the best talent and build capability for new technology
absorption.
Dr Lalji Singh:
It will grow at much faster rate. Several new
institutes are coming up and many old ones are also initiating new fields
in order to be in the forefront of biotechnology.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
By leaps and bounds. The research scientist sitting in
a government lab is going to enjoy the rewarding experience of valuing his
knowledge and capitalizing on it when the biotech industry comes knocking
on his door with the impending IPR and patent regime. |
|
Q. Would you also encourage scientists to become
entrepreneurs in future and what are the steps that you are taking or
intend to take?
Dr CM Gupta:
Yes. The scientists entrepreneur scheme, a pioneering
scheme was launched by CSIR with the objective to generate a cadre of
entrepreneurs amongst CSIR scientists and its scope was further extended
later to include other aspects of knowledge base such as consultancy and
software. There are many scientists from CSIR laboratories, IISc and other
institutions who have opened their own industry.
Dr Lalji Singh:
CCMB offers consultancy to many companies. CSIR has a
system for any scientist to become an entrepreneur.
Dr SK Brahmachari:
CSIR and IGIB have already moved ahead in this
direction. CSIR allows a scientist to pursue entrepreneurship
opportunities. We have examples where scientists from IGIB have indeed
done that. |
|
Q. Would there be increased private-public
cooperation in research (i.e., scientists allowed to work for private firm
and be allowed back or vice-versa?
Dr CM Gupta:
Since drug discovery and development involves large
scale organized efforts, collaboration between private-public sector would
promote better positioning especially for the 1,500 small scale pharma
units currently in the country. There is a global trend towards alliances,
mergers and acquisitions by major pharma companies also.
A number of industry sponsored projects are taken-up by
CSIR laboratories and scientists are permitted to work as consultants for
private firms as per CSIR guidelines.
Dr Lalji Singh:
Yes
Dr SK Brahmachari:
IGIB has very aggressively pursued private-public partnership in
research. Scientists from IGIB have indeed already moved to the industry
and are welcome to join back if they wish to do so. We have two models
already in place: Genomed, a knowledge alliance with Nicholas Piramal Ltd
is well on its way to patenting SNPs, single nucleotide changes in the DNA
which can be of diagnostic value. The Center for Genomic Applications (TCGA),
setup with the participation of government funding agencies and The
Chatterjee Group will provide services to researchers all over the
country. A researcher in IGIB can enjoy the pleasure of working on
fundamental problems in a government research lab and at the same time
participate in the more goal bound prospects of a private establishment.
|
|
CSIR
CSIR has a network of 40 laboratories and 81
field stations/extension centers/regional centers all over India to
undertake R&D in several disciplines including biotechnology. It
currently employs 10,000 highly qualified multidisci-plinary
professionals. |
Rolly Dureha
Page(s) 1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|