New Page 1
Biotech losing steam?
Things are not going too well for the biotechnology industry
which is dependent on cutting edge innovation to develop new, more effective
cures than the chemistry-based pharma sector, against several unconquered
diseases. The product pipeline from the biotech industry seems to be shrinking
if one considers the approval status biotech products by the US government
regulatory, the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA). The US is the world's
largest pharma market and hence the FDA approvals are watched with avid interest
around the world.
Particularly, the last two years, 2006 and 2007, have been
very bad for the biotech industry with just 10 and 11 biopharma products
approved by the FDA. According to a comprehensive study done by Dr Ronald A
Rader, president of Maryland-based Biotechnology Information Institute, the
situation will become alarming for the biotech industry if the FDA approval
trend continues. From an average annual approval rate of 16.6 products, with a
peak of 23 in 1997, it has been a downhill for the industry in recent years.
Many analysts blame the FDA for its over-cautious approach as
a result of recent spate of drug withdrawals from the market. Dr Rader, however,
indicates that this may not be the case. Almost every product which did not get
the FDA approval had some issues related to safety or efficacy. Majority of the
products which got the FDA approval in 2007 were in the me-too categories. Few
of them were original, innovative products. Three most hyped segments-recombinant
proteins, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and indications against cancer-did not
get any approvals from the FDA. In the last 10 years, these three segments were
the most talked about parts of biotech and over 350 products were under
development in these areas from the year 2000. Over half the products under
development are treatments against cancer. Not one mAb or recombinant protein
got approved in 2007 in the US. One promising drug, from Roche, Mircera, a
pegylated recombinant erythropoietin (PEG-EPO) which got approved in 2007 may
not reach the market soon due to issues related to patent infringement.
A lot of drugs are obviously failing during the Phase III
stage. This implies that the developers did not fully understand the strengths
of the product or the regulators are asking too many questions for which the
scientific community has no answers now. Nearly 25 products which had sought FDA
approval in 2007 are still pending with the FDA. An equal number of products
from biotech companies are likely to seek FDA approval in 2008. The approval
trends of FDA will be watched closely this year and in 2009. Whether the biotech
industry will continue to be a trendsetter or face economic decline will depend
on the FDA approval trends in 2008 and 2009. Every one in the industry is
keeping his/her finger crossed.
While the established biotech companies are struggling to
increase their product pipeline, a lot of action is taking place on the ground
in Asia. Singapore is becoming a big hub for the life sciences industry. India
is making every effort to ensure that the country becomes a major destination
for contract research and manufacturing services (CRAMS). The national budget
for 2008-09 has slashed excise duty on manufactured pharma products by half to 8
percent and decreased the federal value added tax by another 2 percent. The
immediate beneficiaries will be the foreign companies who have manufacturing
plants for pharma and biologicals in various parts of the country. Many biotech
companies who have manufacturing units in Bangalore, Hyderabad, Pune and Mumbai
will also benefits. Most Indian pharma companies have shifted their
manufacturing plans to tax-free states of Himachal, Uttaranchal and Jammu and
Kashmir in recent years. Such units can eventually hope to attract more orders
outsourced from pharma companies due to the competitive rates.
Industry leaders will be gathering in Bangalore for the 8th edition of the
Bangalore Bio event and hopefully will get some time to discuss the future
growth strategy for the domestic industry.
<sureshn@cybermedia.co.in>
Page(s) 1 |