 |
|
Dr RA Mashelkar |
The repeated knocks at the doors of the government by the
biotechnology industry has been finally heard. The government has set up a
national task force headed by CSIR chief, Dr RA Mashelkar to streamline the
regulatory process involved in the approval of all recombinant DNA products. The
Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF), which oversees the regulatory agency,
Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC), issued the notification for
setting up the task force on 20 April.
Dr Mashelkar told BioSpectrum that the first meeting of the
Task Force will be held in New Delhi on 12 May. The task force has been asked to
submit its report by May-end.
| The Task Force
members
|
|
1. Dr RA Mashelkar (chairman)
2. Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests
3. Secretary, DBT
4. Secretary, Ministry of Health
5. Director General, ICMR
6. Director General, Drug Controller General of India
7. Dr Amit Ghosh, co-chairman, GEAC
8. Dr CM Gupta, chairman, RCGM
9. Nominee of ABLE (Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw)
10. Nominee of CII
11. Nominee of FICCI
12. Desh Deepak Verma, joint secretary, MoEF.
Terms of Reference
1) Recommend a transparent streamlined regulatory mechanism and process
for the use of LMOs in the pharma industry during the various stages of
R& D testing, manufacture and use.
2) To recommend regulatory process and mechanism for import of LMOs in
the pharma sector. |
The 12-member task force will have three industry
representatives from ABLE, CII and FICCI, besides senior government officials
and scientists. It may be pointed out that the regulatory reforms in the
biopharma sector had been identified by BioSpectrum as one of the Top 10 hurdles
facing the industry and a national debated had since been initiated on this.
Dr Mashelkar’s prescription to set right the ailments
facing various industry sectors have been implemented by the government quickly
in the last few years. So the mood is upbeat in the biotechnology community.
"I commend the MoEF for having set up this task force. By appointing Dr
Mashelkar to head this task force, the Ministry has shown its earnestness in
being proactive to the needs of the biotech industry," said Association of
Biotechnology-Led Enterprises (ABLE) president Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw. ABLE
president had made a special presentation on the industry demands to HRD and
Biotechnology Minister, Dr M M Joshi last January. Added ABLE director-general
Nitin Deshmukh, "We are really heartened by this decision of the MoEF and
look forward to an early resolution of the concerns of the industry on
regulatory matters."
"What we need is a proactive, efficient and knowledge
driven regulatory system which adds value, both for the industry and consumer’s
health," commented New Delhi-based Panacea Biotech joint MD Rajesh Jain.
"This move has come at the right time when the biotech industry is jumping
into the next orbit of change at the global level."
The task force will have a tough task on hand. Industry
leaders have been quick with key suggestions to help the task force with the
tasks ahead.
"The foremost task should be to evolve steps to
straighten out the hurdles and make the regulatory process more transparent,
time-bound and lastly but not the least, ensure pleasant transactions between
industry and regulatory agency by way of simplified procedures," suggested
India’s leading home-grown biotech company, Shantha Biotechnics chairman and
MD Varaprasad Reddy.
Echoing similar sentiments, Dr SD Ravetkar, senior director,
Serum Institute of India, Pune, said "The key areas on which the task force
should focus on are single window clearance, standardizing the operations,
regular committee sittings, and minimum paper work for clearance. Besides, it
should also make suggestions how best the government can implement its
recommendations. Unless the recommendations are implemented, there is no point
in forming the task force or committees."
Another biotech pioneer, Dr Krishna Ella, CMD, Bharat
Biotech, Hyderabad, too welcomed the appointment of a visionary like Dr
Mashelkar to head the task force. His agenda to the task force is:
-
Amend the Environment Protection Act (EPA) 1986 and
exclude medical biotechnology from its purview;
-
Various companies working on highly infectious organisms
can be brought under EPA regardless of whether they are working on
recombinant or non-recombinant products.
-
Must look critically at non-GMP imports from countries
such as China and Russia.
Dr Dhananjay B Patankar, head biotechnology, Intas
Pharmaceuticals, Ahmedabad has formulated a big agenda. "The task force
should look at safety, efficacy and protecting the environmental issues. It
should work on rational and scientific bases and streamline the existing
bottlenecks without compromising the standards. It should come out with clear
and transparent system of regulations that would help the biotechnology
companies. Considering opportunities in contract and clinical research and
contract manufacturing, the system should provide facilities for the
biotechnology companies not to lose the opportunity. At the same time, the task
force should also look at safeguarding the interests of the common man."
Added Dr Swati Piramal, director, strategic planning and
communication, Nicholas Piramal India Ltd, "Setting up of the Task Force is
a move in the right direction, especially with Dr Mashelkar at the helm of
affairs. However, the real need is to quickly build capabilities and mechanisms
that will implement these and earlier recommendations."
Dr Vijay Datla, chairman, Biological E, Hyderabad said the
task force formation was a positive development in the right direction and hoped
the Committee would come out with recommendations for timely clearance of the
proposals and rationalization of regulatory framework. "This was essential
for the growth of the biotech industry which is suffering for want of clear-cut
guidelines," he observed.
He wanted the committee to look into:
-
GEAC working within the scope of the framework laid;
-
There should be a single window for clearance like GEAC
and RCGM under one body under the chairmanship of an eminent person with
Biotechnology background;
-
Permission for Human clinical trial should not be under
the purview of GEAC and their role to be restricted to Environment;
-
Having regular and standard dates for GEAC meeting and
information to be provided through the Internet.
While there is universal support to the task force, many
entrepreneurs feel that some more hands-on industry representatives should be
part of the expert panel to enhance its profile and work.
" Dr Mashelkar has the vision and commitment to nurture
home grown technologies. However, I strongly believe that a scientist, who has
hands-on experience with recombinant DNA based pharmaceuticalproducts should
also be inducted into the Task Force," commented Shantha’s Reddy.
"The whole exercise will lose its weight unless the task force has industry
representation, for which it is targeting at," added Serum’s Ravetkar.
The Task force has been requested to take into account the recommendations of
the Govindarajan committee on re-engineering the regulatory process. Also, the
chairman has been given the option to co-opt persons with required expertise.
Hopefully, the task force will increase the industry representation and pave the
way for a bright future for biopharma.
N Suresh
Indo-Pak biotech initiative picks up
Indian companies are sitting up to take notice of the
potential Pakistan market holds. And Pakistanis are tired of paying a price as
high as seven times are looking for alternative suppliers for several vaccines,
diagnostic kits and other bio-industrial products. A lot of ground has been
covered since Dr Anwar Nasim acknowledged India as a viable option at the
recently concluded BioAsia 2004 in Hyderabad early this year. The Chairman of
Pakistan’s National Commission of Biotechnology, Dr Nasim who had led the
Pakistan delegation to India, is now back home spearheading the case for
cooperation in biotechnology.
 |
| Dr
Anwar Nasim & Dr BS Bajaj |
Government-to-Government cooperation works out to a slow
process, he had nodded agreement. In spite that—of the nine Asian nations that
signed the declaration for formation of Federation of Asian Biotech Associations
(FABA)—Pakistan has moved the fastest. However, even with five MoUs in town
and two of them in the private sector the tangible progress will be visible only
towards the end of this year, believes Dr BS Bajaj, Chair of AIBA, southern
chapter.
Bajaj’s expectation is in line considering that senior
officials of Biological E are planning a Pakistan-visit in the second quarter of
FY05. Biological E is in preliminary stages of negotiation with AMSON Vaccines
and Pharmaceuticals Pvt Limited, Pakistan. Supplying anti-snake venom is one of
the areas they are exploring. AMSON is also negotiating with Transgene Biotek
for technology sharing possibilities, informed Dr AK Sadhu Khan, a senior
official at Transgene. Both the companies admit that the communications with
AMSON consultant Dr Uzair-ul-Ghani are on and positive though too preliminary to
make any projections whatsoever.
"Complex technology transfers are not under
consideration for Indian Immunologicals. We have been talking to the Amson
Consultant Ghani exploring the opportunity to cater to human rabies vaccine
demand in Pakistan. In sourcing from India, there is a clear price advantage for
Pakistan. However, it is in too preliminary a stage to comment on it," said
KV Balasubramaniam, CEO, India Immunologicals.
An almost non-existent pharma and biotechnology industry in
Pakistan makes available the whole range of win-win collaboration opportunities.
While AIBA is helping Pakistan to set-up its biotech association, Hyderabad-based
Magene Life Sciences is making progress on providing training in tune with the
training and technology sharing MoU the company signed during BioAsia.
Two-year-old Magene specializes in basic biology research in areas such as
in-vitro cell based assay development. The company has recently added training
to its list of activities in order to fill an industry-academia gap. According
to its director and CSO Dr Gita Sharma the dynamics of what kind of training is
required, how it is to be disseminated and the size of the batch are all under
discussion with Pakistan. As far as the company is concerned the training can
take off as early as June but the complexities involved in getting the first
batch of trainees from Pakistan will take its time.
With areas of cooperation ranging from bioagri to vaccines to bulk-drugs it
is up to the industry to seize the opportunity. The ease of accessibility of
markets and regulations taking kind note of Indo-Pak collaborations would be the
key in opening up the sector, as would be the grant of visas. And to take it
further all that is required is one success story.
Nandita Singh, CyberMedia News
High profile CII biotech mission heads to USA
CII is organizing a high profile biotech delegation to San
Francisco to make a splash during the BIO2004 convention (6-9 June 2004).
Coinciding with the annual BIO Convention BIO 2004, it also stands alone as an
opportunity for the international biotech community to meet with representatives
of an upward looking and extremely competitive biotech industry. The delegation
consisting of 35 members from different walks of the biotech industry will have
Dr MK Bhan, secretary, Department of Biotechnology, as the Patron and Hari S
Bhartia of Jubilant Organosys as the leader of the Mission. The mission
comprises Avesthagen, Biocon, Birla Institute of Scientific Research, Chembiotek,
Jubilant Organosys, Ocimum Biosolutions, ICICI Knowledge Park, Genome Valley,
Government of Karnataka, Tata Consultancy Services, Shantha Biotech, SRL Ranbaxy,
Neeman Medical International, Panacea Biotec and more.
CII will also be coordinating an "India Evening", a
short conference to highlight the strengths, accomplishments and opportunities
for partnerships with the biotech sector in India. A traditional Indian
reception is also being planned by CII. Hari Bhartia, Mission Leader, informed,
"I am very happy to lead the CII Biotechnology Delegation to the US. We
have indeed put together an impressive program for the Mission. Apart from the
company visits and one-to-one meetings, the Program for 7 June looks to be very
promising. The topics that will be focused upon include: (1) ‘Clinical
Research & Services—Global Clinical Village—Exploring New Horizons for
Speed, Cost and Quality.’ The session will discuss how India can do it fast,
do it well, and do it at less than half the cost at global standards. (2) ‘Bioinformatics
and Contract Research’ session will focus on highlighting the potential in
this area. (3) ‘Financing and Fostering Biotech Ventures and IPR’. The
session will discuss how fostering the right kind of partnerships might be the
answer." He also informed that the panelists are key players in their
fields in India and also international speakers will be invited to give a global
perspective in each session.
It may be mentioned that BIO has chosen CII as the official
contact for participation from India. According to
Dr Sandhya Tewari, CII director, "The organization has formulated a
multi-pronged approach to maximize the visibility for Indian participants. CII
is coordinating an "India
Pavilion" at the BIO Exhibition. The Pavilion will provide an opportunity
for companies and organizations from India, including state governments to
showcase the unique strengths India has in this arena."
Next Page : Arogyapacha raises IPR controversy
Page(s) 1 2 |